Research Interests
Research Interests
Stream Community and Ecosystem Ecology; Restoration Ecology
The broad objective of Dr. Palmer's research is to understand what controls stream ecosystem structure and function. She specifically focuses on restoration ecology and how land use, hydrology and geomorphology influence the health of running-water ecosystems.
Recent Work
Her current research is concentrated on: 1) Evaluating stream ecosystem functions in Coastal Plain lowlands of Maryland and restoration effectiveness; 2) Evaluating the potential for stream restoration to enhance nitrogen removal in Chesapeake Bay tributaries; 3) Climate change impacts on rivers and adaptation options, including models and empirical work on the interactive effects of land use change and climate change on stream ecosystem services.
Recent research includes: 4) effects of land use change on stream ecosystems; 5) synthesizing the scientific status of riverine restoration nationally (NRRSS project); 6) theory and experimentation in restoration; 7) how urbanizing landscapes influence stream fauna and ecosystem processes through changes in the riparian zone, the hydrology, and channel characteristics
Teaching: Dr. Palmer co-teaches a week long summer short course focusing on the fundamental ecological, hydrologic, and geomorphic principles underlying effective stream restoration. This course is offered in Maryland each June and is co-taught by Drs. Peter Wilcock, Jack Schmidt, and Sean Smith. For information about the course, please click here. Dr. Palmer participates in a similar course on the campus of Utah State University that is hosted by Jack Schmidt.
Current Research in Palmer Lab:



Recent research in Palmer Lab:
4) Through an EPA STAR award, Dr. Palmer has been working closely with Montgomery County, MD Department of Environment Protection to evaluate the effect of land use change on stream ecosystems in four urbanizing watersheds in Maryland. This project involves an interdisciplinary team that includes scientists and policy makers (Keith VanNess, Cameron Wiegand) from Montgomery County DEP, hydrologists (led by Glenn Moglen) and economists (led by Nancy Bockstael) from the University of Maryland, and geomorphologists (led by Jim Pizzuto) from the University of Delaware. As a result of this work, Palmer's group (particularly with postdoctoral associate Karen Nelson) is developing models to forecast the effects of land use change on focal species and on ecological processes. This led to current work has also begun on include the interactive effects of land use change and climate change in these models.
5) Dr. Palmer is also very actively involved in research on theory and experimentation in restoration ecology, particularly the methods and effectiveness of various stream restoration approaches. Palmer along with co-authors Don Falk and Joy Zedler have just completed a new book entitled "Foundations of Restorations Ecology" (2006, Island Press) in which the editors and a cast of eminent scientists explore the relationship between ecological theory and restoration ecology. Her work on the link between theory and restoration dates back to a symposium she organized at the 2002 Ecological Society of America meetings, to earlier synthesis (Restoration Ecology. 5:291-300.) and experimental work with her students and post-docs, Brad Cardinale (Ecology. 83:412-422) and Shane Brooks (Restoration Ecology. 10:156-168).
6) Through an NSF-NCEAS award and funding from the Packard and C.S. Mott Foundations, Dr. Palmer along with collaborators, Dr. J. D. Allan (University of Michigan) and former postdoc Dr. Emily Bernhardt (now at Duke University) organized the National River Restoration Science Synthesis (NRRSS) project. The goal of the NRRSS project was to provide a national level scientific synthesis that can be used to inform policy at local, regional, and national levels. The methods involved in-depth research at eight geographic regions in the United States. The U.S.G.S. was a partner in developing the database structure and they have helped us make the database publicly available (http://nrrss.nbii.gov/). Results from the national synthesis were published in Science in 2005 and results for the Chesapeake Bay region in Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment in 2005. The second phase of this work involved interviewing a large number of practitioners to gather more detailed information on how projects were implemented, monitored, and their degree of success. The results from this work will appear in a special issue of the journal Restoration Ecology sometime in 2007. The NRRSS team has published an article proposing five criteria for evaluating the ecological success of a river restoration project. Their paper on proposed criteria is the lead article in a special issue of the British Ecological Society's Journal of Applied Ecology have received positive comments from an international group of rivers scientists (Jansson et al. 2005) and from a group of restoration practitioners (Gillilan et al. 2005). All of these articles are in the February issue (volume 42 (1)) of the journal. Finally, Palmer and co-author Dave Allan have just published a paper with recommendations for federal policy changes to enhance the effectiveness of river restoration (Issues in Science and Technology 2006).
7) In 2005, Dr. Palmer along with graduate student, Laura Craig and collaborators, Keith Van Ness (Montgomery County MD DEP), Meosotis Curtis (Montgomery County MD DEP), Kevin Kelly (Environmental Systems Analysis) and Amy Hennessey (Environment al Systems Analysis) have been awarded an EPA Ecological Sustainability grant to study the effectiveness of new stormwater management strategies adopted in Maryland in 2000. They will be considering structural and functional ecosystem responses in the stream channel (surface water & streambed), adjacent to the stream channel (groundwater), and below the stream channel (hyporheic) to new SWM strategies. An important part of the work will involve determining the underlying biophysical mechanisms that contribute to the effectiveness of the different SWM design strategies.